Port · Malay river-mouth ports (a colour, not a state) · as at first light, 1 January 1200

Kota Cina: the excavated trading settlement behind the Deli mouth

An excavated trading settlement in the mangrove behind the mouth of the Deli, on the strait shore between the Barumun and the Asahan.

The digging (E. Edwards McKinnon, 1970s; from memory) found Chinese stoneware, glass and beads, Tamil inscription fragments, Buddhist and Hindu statues and a wooden jetty, and gives it a working life from about the eleventh or twelfth century to the fourteenth. No text names it. Who ruled it, and whether it was the sea door of the kingdom later called Haru (Aru), is not known: the name Haru is not attested before the Yuan record of 1282 and 1295.

It is the best physical picture of what a working strait port looked like at this date. The Chinese and Tamil communities that its finds imply have their own record.

Who holds it

Name
not known: no source names a chief
Title
Lord or headman of Kota Cina: the excavated trading settlement behind the Deli mouth
Since
not known
Born
not known
Family
not known
Confidence
low

Lord in 1200

not known: no source names a chief

How things stand that morning

Working, on the archaeological dating, if the site was still in business on 1 January 1200. No chief, council or garrison is named.

Council

No headman, judge or council is named in any source.

Communities

The finds point to Chinese and Tamil traders and to Buddhist and Hindu worship. No headman, quarter or temple is named in any text.

Fairs and markets

None known; trade follows the monsoon.

Militia

No source.

Walls and castle

A wooden jetty (excavated). No wall or citadel is attested.

Trade and crafts

Imports shown by the finds: stoneware, glass and beads. What went out is not shown; forest goods of the Batak and Karo uplands are the likely return (our inference, not a source).

Places of note

  • Labuhan Deli (the river mouth): The mouth of the Deli on the strait; the settlement lay inland in the mangrove, behind it.

Where the sources disagree

  • The campaign board says 'Chinese stoneware by the ton'; no weight is given here because we found no excavated figure. The campaign board also says 'secure': the site is secure, its name, ruler and dependence are not.

Evidence: Fair for the existence of a trading port in the twelfth century (excavation, dated by its ceramics); nothing at all for who ruled it or what it was called.

"The campaign board" is OMNIA's working map. These notes record where its earlier claims were checked against the sources.

Primary sources for Malay ports

Chronicles, registers, sagas and inscriptions written in or near 1200 that cover this entry. Each has its own page with editions, translations and where to read it.

Sources and studies

  1. E. E. McKinnon, Kota Cina: its context and meaning in the trade of Southeast Asia in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries (1984), read from memory, not rechecked
  2. Wikipedia (English): Aru Kingdom
  3. OMNIA board note (a lead only, checked against the sources above)

Last revised 4 November 2026. Published 4 November 2026. Suggest a correction on the OMNIA Discord.