The valleys of the lower Beas and the Sutlej above the Siwalik foot, from the Beas gorge at Mandi to Kahlur on the Sutlej, were held by small Rajput chiefs whose families remember a Sena origin (Suket) or a Chandel one (Kahlur).
Mandi, in the family tradition, branches off Suket about this time. Nothing is dated: we give the shape of the country and no raja.
Who he is
- Title
- Raja of Suket (Sen line)
- Since
- not known
- Born
- not known
- Family
- By the late family tradition the Sen rajas of Suket came from the Sena of Bengal; Mandi is a branch of Suket whose founding falls in the generations about 1200 in the Mandi tradition (unchecked). Kahlur (Bilaspur) is held by a Chandel line.
- Confidence
- low
Tradition only. Hutchison and Vogel vol. 2 was refused by the fetch tool.
What it holds
- The Suket valley (Sundernagar, Pangna)
- The Beas gorge at Mandi, a crossing and a salt-road place
- Kahlur, the Sutlej hill country of the Chandel line (Bilaspur)
How it was acquired
Hereditary.
Allies and rivals
Kangra to the north-west, Kullu to the north, the Simla hill thakurais to the south, the Ghurid Punjab below.
How things stand that morning
Several small hill lordships, the first of them probably already formed, outside any recorded Ghurid reach. Mandi's founding date in the tradition cannot be tested.
Wealth
Salt from Guma and Drang (later, unchecked), timber, grain, tolls on the Beas gorge.
Military
Hill levies; no numbers.
Threats
- None named
What the year holds
What happened next, if nothing in play changes it. Each event carries what it depends on and what would stop it.
- about 1200 (family tradition, unchecked)Mandi branches off Suket under a brother of the Suket raja.Depends on: The tradition being right. Stopped by: Not testable.
Places of note
- Mandi: Beas gorge crossing
- Sundernagar (Suket): valley of the Sen rajas
Where the sources disagree
- The campaign board entry has "Suket" and "Mandi (the Beas gorge)" as territory with no fortress of note. That is right for the evidence: no fort of the decade is named.
Evidence: Late tradition only.
"The campaign board" is OMNIA's working map. These notes record where its earlier claims were checked against the sources.
On the map: District block; no border inside it is known for 1200.
Primary sources for Hill rajas
Chronicles, registers, sagas and inscriptions written in or near 1200 that cover this entry. Each has its own page with editions, translations and where to read it.
- The River of Kings, with Jonaraja's continuation, Kalhana; continued by Jonaraja (Kalhana 1148 to 1150; Jonaraja about 1459). Kalhana's chronicle stops in 1149, so for 1200 the witness is Jonaraja, writing three centuries later and very briefly. Read online
- The Gopala Raja Chronicle, and the Nepalese colophons, Anonymous (chronicle); various scribes (colophons) (the chronicle about 1389; the colophons are contemporary notes of the 11th to 14th centuries). The Nepal valley in 1200 is known chiefly from dated manuscript colophons and short inscriptions, which name the reigning king with the Nepal era year, and from the Gopalarajavamsavali, a chronicle written about 1389 that lists the kings with regnal years.
Sources and studies
- Hutchison and Vogel, History of the Panjab Hill States, vol. 2 (Suket, Mandi, Kullu, Jammu): NOT read, the fetch of the full text was refused; what is said of these houses is the late dynastic tradition from general knowledge and is flagged unchecked
Last revised 4 November 2026. Published 4 November 2026. Suggest a correction on the OMNIA Discord.